Legal Opinion

Weidner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 25, 1988No. A-420PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENE, Judge.

Attorney Phillip Paul Weidner was ordered to pay $4,650.00 1 as sanctions for alleged violations of court orders during his trial defense of the defendant in State v. Stump/. 2

During the three-month trial in State v. Stump/, there were numerous incidents which led the trial judge, J. Justin Ripley, to admonish or sanction Weidner for violating court orders. There were at least eight such incidents prior to the time that the court began imposing monetary sanctions. The sanctions generally increased in amount as the trial continued. .The first imposition of a sanction was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chilkoot Lumber Co. v. Rainbow Glacier Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Holden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  3. Lana C. v. Cameron P.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Chilkoot Lumber Co. v. Rainbow Glacier Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In the Matter of Jacob Sonneborn, Regarding Fees and Costs Imposed in Bradbury-Haltness v. Haltness, IIIAlaska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API