Legal Opinion

Smith v. Klemm

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 27, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Chief Justice.

This is a ■workmen’s compensation case and is before us on a writ of certiorari, the employe appearing as prosecutor. That this case presents a most ■unusual situation will be clear when the following pertinent facts, as they appear in the state of the case, are read. We find a claim petition for compensation without date or number or any indication to show just when it was filed in the workmen’s compensation bureau.

We gather from the petition that the employe seeks increased compensation; that the accident happened on October 10th, 1930; that the injuries arose out of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Riccioni v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Greif v. Betsy Ross Ice Cream Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API