Legal Opinion

United States v. Goldsmith Fruit Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 25, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, District Judge.

The suit involves the validity of the order provisions of the Agriculture Adjustment Act, approved May 12,1933, as amended on August 24, 1935 (7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.), the validity of Order No. 7, which is an order regulating the handling of citrus fruit grown in the State of Florida, and which was issued by the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States pursuant to section 8c of title I of said act, as added by Act Aug. 24, 1935, § 5 (7 U.S.C.A. § 608c). The defendant is a handler of citrus fruit, and it is alleged by the sworn bill of complaint that said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. David Buttrick Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
  3. Ganley v. WallaceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. KirklandDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1937
  2. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Op., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1939
  3. Hudson-Duncan & Co. v. WallaceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API