Legal Opinion

State v. Everitt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1923No. 18200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant was convicted under an information charging him with having operated a gambling game commonly known as “Blackjack,” as owner thereof.

It is conceded by the state that to be convicted appellant must have opened, conducted and operated the game as owner.

The evidence shows that, at the time in question, he was operating, as sole owner, a pool hall in South Bend, known as the Olympic Club Pool Hall, under a license required for such resorts from the municipality. He had as his only known employee one Nelson. Billiards and pool and games of cards were played in the pool room, where there…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. HazzardWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State v. PittamWashington Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. SilverWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API