Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 25, 1986No. 85-1035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In its petition for certiorari, the State maintains that in reversing the defendant's conviction the Court of Criminal Appeals, 495 So.2d 104 erred, because, the State says, defense counsel, on cross-examination of witness Eastland, failed to lay a proper predicate before attempting to show bias. The State argues that defense counsel was required to question Eastland about the state of her feelings toward the defendant before asking her if she had been indicted on drug charges. However, such an inquiry is not a condition precedent to questioning an adverse witness concerning matters tending…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API