Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Farley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of ti-ib Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

In October, 1912, appellees, Matilda Farley and ber Imsband, sold and by deed conveyed to appellant 478 marked trees standing on land owned by Mrs. Farley, and it was stipulated in tbe deed that the trees were to be cut and removed from tbe land witbin five years thereafter.

In May, 1920, Mrs. Farley and ber husband instituted this action against Maynard to quiet ber title to tbe land, alleging that the defendant was casting a cloud upon same by persistently claiming under bis recorded deed title to the trees which be bad not cut or removed, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Stamper v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Wright v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ream v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. Fish v. MurrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Floyd Elkhorn Consolidated Collieries v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. J. P. Burton Coal Company v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API