Ogletree v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. While a stranger without any interest needing ' protection in a cause is not entitled to intervene therein (Clarke v. Wheatley, 113 Ga. 1074, 39 S. E. 437; Clark v. Harrison, 182 Ga. 56 (3), 184 S. E. 620), yet one who actually has an interest in the subject-matter of an equity cause ordinarily may intervene to protect his rights. Allen v. Mitchell, 143 Ga. 476, 478 (85 S. E. 336); Blalock v. Jonesboro, 147 Ga. 485, 486 (94 S. E. 567); Blaisdell v. Bohr, 68 Ga. 56 (3), 61.
2 The keeping or maintaining of any place or resort where intoxicating liquor is sold or kept for sale…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bashinski v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Clarke v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carson v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Sprayberry v. WyattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Pullen v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Morris v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Carpenter v. State Ex Rel. HainsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.