Pitts Agricultural Works v. Baker
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Kingsbury county. Hon. Julian Bennett, Judge. Action in claim an The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Corson, P. J,
This is an action in claim and delivery, by which plaintiff sought to recover the possession of certain agricultural machinery. The defendant, Baker, interposed an answer, and Maxwell and the Central Dakota Bank filed their complaints as interveners. The plaintiff interposed á demurrer to the answer, and also to the complaints of intervention. The demurrers were overruled, and from the order overruling the same the plaintiff appeals.
It appears from plaintiff’s complaint that the property in controversy was mortgaged to it by the defendant, Baker, to secure about §2,500. Default…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People's Sav. Inst. v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Edmonds v. RileySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902