Legal Opinion

Nothdurft v. Ross

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Jiudice, J.

The defendant moves for summary judgment in an action initiated by the plaintiff for a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff cross-moves for the same relief.

The plaintiff, an accredited psychological stress evaluator operator and examiner, has commenced a declaratory judgment action in which he seeks to have the court declare section 1 of chapter 30 of the Laws of 1978 (Labor Law, §§ 733-739, inclusive) void and unconstitutional.

In 1978, article 20-B (§§ 733 through 739) of the Labor Law became effective.

Article 20-B made it unlawful for an employer or his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Farrington v. PinckneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Gregory v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Scott v. Transkrit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Nothdurft v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API