Payne v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OVARD, Justice.
Curtis Allen Payne appeals his jury conviction for burglary of a building. Payne answered true to two enhancement paragraphs, and the jury assessed punishment at forty years’ imprisonment. In two points of error, Payne complains that the trial court erred in admitting (1) a complaining witness’s identification testimony and (2) hearsay testimony. We hold that the trial court properly admitted the witness’s identification and that Payne waived any error in the admission of the hearsay testimony. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
FACTS
Early on the morning of March 17,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arthur Lafayette, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Charles Schroeder v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
- David Allen Russell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Jeffrey Lynn Carter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007