State v. Hayes
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The sole question in this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it dismissed the indictment and bill of particulars (charging defendant with sexual battery of Crystal Ellison in violation of R.C. 2907.03[A] [5]) “to the extent” that the Latin phrase in loco parentis is void for vagueness. The court granted only that part of defendant’s motion to dismiss and denied the motion “in all other respects.” We dismissed the prosecution’s appeal for lack of a final ap-pealable order, but our dismissal was reversed by the Supreme Court. State v. Hayes (1986), 25 Ohio St. 3d 173, 25 OBR 214, 495…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CatonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Cleveland Industrial Square, Inc. v. Cleveland Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992