Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 16, 1993Published

1Concurring in the judgmentClifford, J.

Caught between a rock and a hard place — the rock of the Court’s somewhat complex explication of the real-estate broker’s duty, and the hard place of the dissent’s near-hysterical forecast of doom, despair, destruction, and the demise of Western civilization — I write but briefly to express my concurrence with the Court’s judgment.

At the outset I confess that (apparently unlike the rest of the Court) I see this case as, in today’s parlance, “no big deal,” in the sense of a cataclysmic change in the law. We just nudge the law forward an inch or so. True, for the first time we apply to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API