Legal Opinion

State v. Webb, 06-Ca-1694 (6-29-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. 06-CA-1694PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Randall L. Webb appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, without a hearing. In his petition, Webb contended that his trial counsel was ineffective for having failed to subpoena bank records and one live witness, an accountant, for a hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude that Webb has failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by these failures. Specifically, Webb has failed to demonstrate that there is a reasonable likelihood that the outcome of the hearing on his motion to withdraw his plea would have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. Zamora, 11-08-04 (9-2-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. McCainOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API