Legal Opinion
Trepel v. Eaton
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 18, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 82-70806PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHURCHILL, District Judge.
Before the Court are the defendants’ motions for allowance of attorney fees pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 32 governing mediation practice.
The plaintiffs’ claims for legal malpractice against the several defendants were tried along with one of the law firm’s counterclaim for attorney fees. On November 1, 1983, judgment was entered pursuant to a jury verdict of no cause of action on the plaintiffs’ claims. The judgment awarded defendant Gray, Plant, Mooty & Bennett (“Gray, Plant”) $22,775.77 on its counterclaim. On January 25 and February 9,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re American Casualty Company, American Casualty Company, (86-1728), (87-1125) v. City of Detroit, (86-1728), (87-1125), Brady Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Jackson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Jackson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Martin L. Trepel v. Berrien C. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985