State ex rel. Mack v. Richland Cty. Sheriff's Office
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 358.] THE STATE EX REL . MACK v. RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE [Cite as State ex rel. Mack v. Richland Cty. Sheriff’s Office,
2024-Ohio-2748.] Mandamus—Public Records Act—R.C. 149.43—Statutory damages—Public office from which records were requested must produce responsive records to which the R.C. 149.43(B)(8) exception does not apply or certify that no such records exist—Limited writ granted and statutory damages denied. (No. 2023-1201—Submitted April 23, 2024—Decided July 23, 2024.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Striker v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Sultaana v. Mansfield Corr. Inst.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- State ex rel. Fernbach v. BrushOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Penland v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Mauk v. SheldonOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- State ex rel. Mauk v. SheldonOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- State ex rel. Robinson v. ClemansOhio Supreme Court · 2025