Legal Opinion

Rodeo-Vallejo Ferry Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 25, 1931No. Docket Nos. 36411, 48528PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Obsolescence on petitioner's ferry boats allowed.

1Opinion of the Court

*939OPINION.

Van Fossan:

The statute (section 234 (a) (7) of the Bevenue Act of 1924) provides for “ a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear of property used in a trade or business, including a reasonable allowance for obsolescence.” In Loewers Gambrinus Brewery v. United States, 282 U. S. 638, Mr. Justice Butler states, “ the language of section 234 (a) (7) is broad enough to include all obsolescence from whatever cause.” And in Burnet v. Niagara Falls Brewing Co., 282 U. S. 648, the same learned justice said:

* * * The word [obsolescence] is much used, and its meaning depends upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Niagara Falls Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Radio Station WBIR, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Des Moines Title Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  3. Radio Station WBIR, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Rodeo-Vallejo Ferry Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API