Legal Opinion

Hudepohl Brewing Co. v. Bannister

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1943No. 360Published

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

This matter is before me a second time on defendant’s motion to dismiss.

On February 16, 1942, plaintiff filed an action1 against the defendant, and sought to recover on the same cause of action set forth in the complaint now under consideration. The first complaint was dismissed on the ground that it did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted, (D.C., 45 F.Supp. 201) because the letter written by the defendant, considered in the light of the circumstances surrounding its writing, did not constitute a guaranty. No appeal was taken from the order to dismiss,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Eastern B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  2. Herndon v. WardlawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  3. Hudepohl Brewing Co. v. BannisterDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942
  4. Pennell & Harley, Inc. v. HearonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API