Legal Opinion

Dolph v. Speckart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1919Published

From Multnomah.: Robert Tucker, Judge. In Bane. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion

Affirmed January 6, 1920.

On the Merits.

(186 Pac. 32.)

Department 2.

Chester V. Dolph, an attorney at law, brings this action against Harriet P. Speckart to recover for personal services, pursuant to a written contract. A verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff and from a judgment thereon defendant appeals.

*556Several years before entering into this contract defendant bad been left a considerable amount of property by her deceased father, Adolph Speckart, who died in Butte, Montana, in 1903, leaving a will by which he devised and bequeathed one third of Ms property to his widow, one third to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shannon v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kersey v. GartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API