Baumohl v. COLUMBIA JEWELRY COMPANY
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
Defendants’ several motions to dismiss question the jurisdiction of this court and the suability of one of the defendants. The complaint cites no statute, but alleges that “The matter in controversy exceeds, exclusion of interest and costs, the sum of $3000.00 and Defendant, U. S. Treasury Department Internal Revenue Service, is an instrumentality of the U. S. Government”. At the argument plaintiff’s counsel claimed jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1340, which provides:
“The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Krouse v. United States Government Treasury Department Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1974
- M & M Transportation Co. v. U. S. Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Washburn v. ShapiroDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1976
- Baumohl v. Columbia Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.