Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fuku-Bonsai, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1999No. 98-15429Published

1DissentBoochever, Circuit Judge

It is agreed that Delaware law applies in deciding whether the release signed by Fuku-Bonsai bars it from bringing this suit claiming that DuPont fraudulently withheld or concealed information that induced Fuku-Bonsai to settle its claims for less than fair value.

When we decided Matsuura v. Alston & Bird and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 166 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir.1999) (per cu-riam), the Delaware Supreme Court had not accepted certification of the controlling state law question. Once the Delaware Supreme Court answers that question, our decision in Matsuura will no longer be binding on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. David Matsuura, Individually and Dba Orchid Isle Nursery, and Stephen Matsuura, Individually and Dba Hawaiian Dendrobium Farm, Plaintiffs-Counter v. Alston & Bird, a Georgia Partnership Including Professional Corporations, and E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Counter David Matsuura, Individually Dba Orchid Isle Nursery Stephen Matsuura, Individually Dba Hawaiian Dendrobium Farm v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API