Legal Opinion

Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms of U.S. Department of Treasury

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 28, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-1716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.

This action comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, plaintiff’s opposition thereto, defendant’s two supplemental memoranda in support of its motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment and the entire record herein. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.

On March 22, 1983, the Disclosure Office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (“BATF” or “agency”), defendant, received an initial Freedom of Information Act request…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eudey v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  2. Rizzo v. TylerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. Burriss v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Ely v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Crooker v. United States Marshals ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API