Legal Opinion

Mariano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 1993No. 92-0218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged by information with uttering a forged prescription for a controlled substance, bontril, and she entered a plea of not guilty and elected a nonjury trial. The trial court found appellant guilty as charged, withheld adjudication, and sentenced her to six months’ probation. We reverse.

Section 893.13(3)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1991), under which appellant was charged, provides that it is unlawful “[t]o acquire or obtain, or attempt to acquire or obtain, possession of a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception, or subterfuge.” (emphasis added). The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. Mayo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mercer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Cortez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API