Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Gloystein

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1923No. 24,277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee sued to construe the will of appellant's decedent. Appellant was not an heir nor a beneficiary under the will, and so testified at the trial, testifying that appellee is the sole heir, and that the sole beneficiary named in the will, and designated therein by the testator as “my wife”, was the wife of the testator, and died childless three years before he died. Appellant seeks to appeal only as administratrix with the will annexed, nobody else joining in the appeal. Her official position as such administratrix gives her no right to maintain the appeal. Murphey v. Murphey (1910), 174…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphey v. MurpheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Case v. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Priest, Rec. v. Amos, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Taylor v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API