Legal Opinion · Dissent
Milliman, Inc. v. Maryland State Retirement & Pension System
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 20, 2011No. 102, September Term, 2010Published
1Dissent
HARRELL, J., dissenting, in which MURPHY and ADKINS, JJ., join.
The Maryland Code requires the Maryland State Retirement and Pension System (“the System”) to employ the services of an actuary to “give technical advice ... on the operation of the funds,” among other duties. Maryland Code (1993, 2009 Repl.Val., 2010 Supp.), State Personnel and Pensions Article, § 21-125(a).1 Pursuant to the statute, each year, the State contributes to an “accumulation fund,” which the System stewards and uses to meet obligations to employee-members. See §§ 3-501, 21-302-308. The State bases these contributions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- A. S. Abell Publishing Co. v. MezzanoteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.