Legal Opinion

Palazzo v. Hartford Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest is obligated to indemnify the defendant Richard J. Corio in this action, and to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 30, 2002, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest which was for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend and indemnify defendant Richard J. *712Corio in this action, and, in effect, denied their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. KowalskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Appell v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Lindner v. WilkersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. IqbalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Reichert v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API