McKeon v. Manze
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from City Court of Buffalo. Action by Robert McKeon against Thomas Manze and another. From a judgment of the City Court of Buffalo for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtWhfeler, J.
The evidence shows that the defendant Manze is the proprietor of a saloon at No. 133 Main street in the city of Buffalo', and in connection with the saloon runs a sort of hotel or lodging house for the accommodation of guests. These rooms are in the building above the saloon proper. In connection with the saloon the proprietor had a lunch counter, where lunches were served without charge to those *624buying drinks at the bar. The'proprietor employed a barkeeper to serve drinks, and Taft, the codefendant with the proprietor, was in charge of the lunch counter. Serving free lunches was discontinued…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- De Wolf v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Russell v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Aaron v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Rommel v. SchambacherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- June McKee v. Sheraton-Russell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Schell v. VergoRochester City Court · 1938
- Trebitsch v. Goelet Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Tobin v. SlutskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Gorman v. JaffaMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.