Legal Opinion
Spencer Oil Co. v. Welborn
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 20, 1974No. 7418DC4PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
It appears to us that the findings of fact by the trial judge do not support his conclusion “that the plaintiff has shown no right to recover against the defendant, Ruth Welborn.”
The trial court found from competent evidence the following facts, among others:
*685“ (8) That thereafter defendant, Austin Welborn, returned to plaintiff with the bond and guaranty agreement signed by himself and his wife, . . . and delivered said bond and guaranty agreement, along with the contract to plaintiff.”
“(7) ‘ . . . [T]hat defendant, Ruth Welborn, never at any time informed plaintiff that…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. CreasyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. CreasyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. CreasyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Mills International, Inc. v. Holmes (In re Mills International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017