Legal Opinion

Spencer Oil Co. v. Welborn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1974No. 7418DC4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

It appears to us that the findings of fact by the trial judge do not support his conclusion “that the plaintiff has shown no right to recover against the defendant, Ruth Welborn.”

The trial court found from competent evidence the following facts, among others:

*685“ (8) That thereafter defendant, Austin Welborn, returned to plaintiff with the bond and guaranty agreement signed by himself and his wife, . . . and delivered said bond and guaranty agreement, along with the contract to plaintiff.”
“(7) ‘ . . . [T]hat defendant, Ruth Welborn, never at any time informed plaintiff that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. CreasyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. CreasyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. CreasyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Mills International, Inc. v. Holmes (In re Mills International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API