Legal Opinion

Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. Marshland Dredging Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1972No. 71-3042PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Claiming diminishment of its gas supply caused by Marshland’s fracture of the- underwater line of its supplier, Sugar Bowl Gas Company, Kaiser sued Marshland for consequential damages. From an adverse summary judgment for Marshland, Kaiser appeals. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. A barge owned by Marshland Dredging, while engaged in cleaning an outfall canal entering the Mississippi under a contract with Humble Oil, dropped a heavy anchor which punctured a high pressure gas pipeline owned and operated by Sugar Bowl Gas Company. This puncture caused immediate interruption of gas fuel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. State of Louisiana v. TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Louisville And Nashville Railroad Co. v. The Tug M/V Bayou LacombeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Hamilton v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API