Dares v. O'Donnell

Appellee moved the dismissal of this appeal, asserting that no suspensive appeal bond was filed and calling attention to certain clerical omissions in the bond, which was filed.

In our original opinion (147 So. 99) we discussed the various contentions presented by appellee and we held that none of the objections urged was sufficient to dismiss the appeal. We further said that, even had any of the technical objections been well founded, we could not have sustained those objections because of the fact that they had not been presented in the court below.

In the application for rehearing appellee…