Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Mayor of Natchez

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1954No. 38999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Appellants, Alma Alexander and others, complainants below, have filed a motion to retax the costs. The judgment of this Court taxed all costs against the direct appellants and cross-appellees, the movants herein. 68 So. 2d 434, 442. Appellants base their request for an equal division of the costs upon the argument that the *209defendants below did not properly perfect tbeir cross-appeal, in tbat they filed no appeal bond for their cross-appeal, and that defendants and cross-appellants never attempted to file a cross-appeal until they filed their brief.

However, we think that the cross-appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. Board of EducationUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Alexander v. Mayor and Bd. of AldermenMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Buckley v. United Gas Public Service, Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Crawley v. IvyMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duckworth v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API