Alexander v. Mayor of Natchez
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
Appellants, Alma Alexander and others, complainants below, have filed a motion to retax the costs. The judgment of this Court taxed all costs against the direct appellants and cross-appellees, the movants herein. 68 So. 2d 434, 442. Appellants base their request for an equal division of the costs upon the argument that the *209defendants below did not properly perfect tbeir cross-appeal, in tbat they filed no appeal bond for their cross-appeal, and that defendants and cross-appellants never attempted to file a cross-appeal until they filed their brief.
However, we think that the cross-appellants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. Board of EducationUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Alexander v. Mayor and Bd. of AldermenMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Buckley v. United Gas Public Service, Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1936
- Crawley v. IvyMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duckworth v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963