Wasielewski v. Vossler

Lawton and Doerr, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. Petitioner was " 'impacted]’ ” and became "aggrieved” when her job classification was excluded from the eligibility list *1045(Matter of Edmead v McGuire, 67 NY2d 714, 716; see, Mundy v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 44 NY2d 352, 357). Nor is there an issue that petitioner was unaware of her disqualification so as to toll the running of the Statute of Limitations (see, Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834). The letter of September 10, 1992, signed by petitioner and some 51 others similarly classified,…