Legal Opinion

Neely v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 19, 2006No. 01-05-00377-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELSA ALCALA, Justice.

Appellant, George R. Neely, appeals from a judgment that he engaged in professional misconduct in violation of rules 7.02(a), 7.03(a), 7.04(j), 7.05, and 7.07 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (Part VII). Trial was to the court, which also imposed disciplinary sanctions on Neely. In four issues, Neely challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings of professional misconduct and to support the sanctions imposed. Neely also contends that the trial court’s interpretation and application of Part VII violated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Point Lookout West, Inc. v. WhortonTexas Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anthony G. Buzbee, and the Buzbee Law Firm v. Roberto Canales, M.D. and Roberto Canales, M.D. P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2021
  2. Milton James Anthony v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. William Wesley Ruth v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API