Legal Opinion

Neal Horsley v. Geraldo Rivera

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 28, 2002No. 01-15821PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

Defendant/appellant Geraldo Rivera appeals the district court’s determination that a statement Rivera made to plaintiff/appellee Neal Horsley during the course of a television program hosted by Rivera is not protected as a matter of law by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution nor by applicable state law. Rivera asserted that Horsley was an “accomplice to murder.” Because we find that Rivera’s allegedly defamatory statement is absolutely protected as rhetorical hyperbole by both the First Amendment and applicable state defamation law, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Andrx Pharmaceuticals v. Elan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Daniels v. Metro Magazine Holding Co., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Edwards v. SchwartzDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
  5. Figuereo-Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API