Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Abebe v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 2009No. 05-76201Published

1Concurring in the judgmentClifton, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment, denying in part and dismissing in part Yewhalashet Abebe’s petition for review. I do not join most of the majority opinion,1 however, because I believe it is both unnecessary and unwise to overrule our prior decision in Tapia-Acuna r. INS, 640 F.2d 223 (9th Cir.1981), to reach that result. The government has not advocated such a drastic step. The original decision by a three-judge panel of our court, Abebe v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir.2007), reached the same result in this case as the majority reaches today, simply by applying our existing precedent, Komarenko…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Melesio Manuel Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Gilberto Redondo-LemosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Zamora-Mallari v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Blake v. CarboneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API