Legal Opinion · Dissent

Junigan v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1982No. 3-382A49Published

1DissentHoffman, Presiding Judge

I dissent. The decision rendered by the majority does little to promote the orderly and expeditious administration of justice. As noted in my dissent to Wente v. State (1982) Ind.App., 440 N.E.2d 512, the majority’s dismissal will undoubtedly compel the appellant to seek appellate review through filing a petition for post-conviction relief. Ind. Rules of Procedure, Post-Conviction Rule 2, § 1. At that point this Court will have to reach the merits of appellant’s contentions notwithstanding any procedural defects in the case currently before us. Requiring this additional effort in order to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American States Ins. v. State Ex Rel. Jennings & BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Wente v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API