Legal Opinion

Mignoli v. Oyugi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*444To sustain a cause of action for medical malpractice, a plaintiff must prove a deviation or departure from accepted practice and that such departure was a proximate cause of plaintiffs injury (Frye v Montefiore Med. Ctr., 70 AD3d 15, 24 [2009]). Here, defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence, including the decedent’s hospital records, the deposition testimony and the affirmations of various medical experts, including a board certified medical oncologist with a thoracic speciality and a thoracic surgeon, demonstrating that they did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frye v. Montefiore Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Browder v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Polanco v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Guido v. FieldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Guido v. FieldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Bello v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  5. DeCintio v. Lawrence HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API