Legal Opinion

Marenna's Appeal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the county commissioners of New Haven County authorizing the transfer of a wholesale liquor license from one locality to another in the city of New Haven, taken by a remonstrating taxpayer to, and tried by, the Superior Court in New Haven County, Williams, J.; facts found and judgment rendered reversing the decision of the county commissioners, and appeal by Joseph Quint, the applicant for the transfer. No error.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

By § 2643 of the General Statutes, the county commissioners are authorized to license suitable persons to sell spirituous and intoxicating liquors at suitable places. The application for a removal permit by a licensed person under § 2669 of the statutes is to be treated as an application for a new license at the place to which the business is to be removed. Bormann’s Appeal, 81 Conn. 458, 461, 71 Atl. 502. A locality where there already exists a sufficient number of licensed places is an unsuitable locality for the licensing of other places. D’Amato’s Appeal, 80 Conn. 357, 362, 68 Atl. 445.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bormann's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. D'Amato's Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sayers' Appeal From County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Penyak v. Liquor Control CommissionPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1949
  3. Penyak v. Liquor Control CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API