Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Barr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from, Finney District Court. ActioN to recover money and to foreclose a sub-contractor’s lien. Judgment for defendant Barr, at the May term, 1888. The plaintiffs, Cunningham and others, bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VALENTINE, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Finney county, by Henry C. Cunningham, Isaac N. McBeth and Edward H. McBeth, partners as The Western Lumber Company, against George W. Keeler and E. L. Hudson, partners as Keeler & Hudson, and Benjamin H. Barr, to obtain a personal judgment against Keeler & Hudson, for the sum of $412.91 and interest, and to foreclose a sub*159contractor’s lien as against the defendant Barr. The defendant Barr demurred to the plaintiffs’ petition upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clough v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Kansas Lumber Co. v. Cheng-Yuan WangCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
  3. P. T. Walton Lumber Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Weyerhaeuser v. FraimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API