Thomas Patrick Schram v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Schram appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing, without an evidentiary hearing, his petition for federal habeas relief from an Oregon judgment. (28 U.S.C. §§ 2241-2254.) He had exhausted his state remedies before he filed his petition for federal relief.1
At issue is the constitutional validity of two prior convictions relied upon by an Oregon court to increase the penalty upon his last conviction from three years to twenty years under the provisions of Oregon's habitual offender statute. (Ore.Rev.Stat. § 168.015 et seq.)
Schram’s Oregon convictions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Perry Goodwin v. S. Lamont Smith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Wong v. AmongHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. BowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- McGhee v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Russell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.