Legal Opinion

Culver v. Port Allegany Reporter Argus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1991No. 207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action for an alleged invasion of privacy, the trial court sustained the newspaper defendant’s preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer and dismissed the complaint. The court held that there could be no cause of action for the accurate publication of information obtained by a reporter while attending a public meeting of the local school board. The claimants appealed. We affirm the order of the trial court.

A demurrer admits as true all well-pleaded factual averments set forth in the complaint, as well as all inferences reasonably deducible therefrom. However,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Larsen v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Marks v. Bell Tel. Co. of Penn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Santillo v. ReedelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. PG Publishing Co. v. County of WashingtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Santillo v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1993
  4. PG Publishing Co. v. County of WashingtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API