Legal Opinion

North v. Robinette

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This action was brought by petitioner, Kyle C. North, against respondents, Mary Robinette, Melinda Cooter, Randall Larkin, and David Lindamood, to specifically enforce a lease-purchase contract of realty. In defense, the respondents took the position that petitioner had breached the contract and also that a forced sale of the property to petitioner for $12,000.00 (the value placed on the property by an appraiser chosen by petitioner) would constitute a *96constructive fraud upon respondents in view of a then existing offer to purchase the property for $19,500.00. Question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. FOUR EIGHTS, LLC. v. SalemCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Marder's Nurseries, Inc. v. HoppingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. American Board of Craniofacial Pain v. American Board Of Orofacial PainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  4. Earl M. Shahan v. Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. Four Eights, LLC. v. Ahmad Salem and Ahmad Salem v. Four Eights, LLC.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API