Legal Opinion

Schaus v. Putscher

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided September 15, 1863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bosworth, Ch. Justice.

This is an application ex parte for an order of arrest for assault and battery. It is .conceded that the defendant is a married woman, though the affidavit does not state whether she is or not.

Before the Code, a married woman could not be held to bail in such an action, though the husband might, and be compelled to give bail for both. (Graham’s Pr., 127.) The Code has not changed the law on this point. (Solomon agt. Waas and wife, 2 Hilt., 179.)

Chapter 90 of the Laws of 1860, and chapter 179 of the Laws of 1862, do not profess to touch this question. The law of 1860…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Solomon v. WaasNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karow v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API