Legal Opinion

State v. Cude

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1963No. 9619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

Defendant appeals from his conviction and judgment of grand larceny. It appears from the record that the defendant left his automobile at a garage in Ogden, Utah with the request that the same be repaired. The garage owner initially estimated the cost of the necessary work to be in the neighborhood of $180.00. There was evidence, however, that the defendant authorized the garage owner to fix the car, irrespective of the cost. After leaving his automobile at the garage, defendant left the state and returned a few days later. At that time he was presented with a repair bill…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HickenbottomWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. McCrackenMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Linde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. State v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StringhamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  2. Haas v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Stevens v. Sanpete CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
  4. State v. CudeUtah Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API