Legal Opinion
Morrison v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1990No. 86-990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant Carl Morrison appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity and for unconditional release pursuant to D.C.Code § 24-301(k) (1989 Repl.). He contends that his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) should be vacated and his commitment to St. Elizabeths Hospital set aside because the trial judge failed to address him personally regarding the voluntariness of his plea and to advise him of the direct consequences of his NGI plea in violation of Super.Ct.Crim.R. 11. Therefore, he maintains that he did not make a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Caldwell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kyle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Pettiford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.