Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2006No. 03-4829, 03-4878, 04-4117PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINS wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG joined. Judge DEVER wrote an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

WILKINS, Chief Judge.

Karl E. Moore, Sr., Terrance Smith, and Rodney Reep (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal their convictions and sentences in this drug conspiracy case. Concluding that all of Appellants’ numerous arguments are without merit,1 we affirm.

I

The underlying facts are not directly pertinent to the issues raised on appeal and thus may be briefly stated. In 1997, Moore and his family moved from…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Donathan Wayne HaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Mohammad HassanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Jorge CornellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API