Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. Pinard-Cronin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2008No. S-07-275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

INTRODUCTION

On March 16, 2007, formal charges were filed by the office of the Counsel for Discipline, relator, against Carol Pinard-Cronin, respondent. The formal charges set forth two counts that included allegations that respondent violated the following provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility: Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(5) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice); Canon 6, DR 6-101(A)(l) (handling matter not competent to handle); DR 6-101(A)(2) (inadequately preparing to handle legal matter); and DR 6-101(A)(3) (neglecting legal matter); as well as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. WickenkampNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. STATE COUNSEL FOR DISCIPLINE v. WadmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. OF NEB. SUPREME COURT v. OrrNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API