Legal Opinion

Ryan Debord v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 2014No. 1D12-6067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Ryan DeBord, appeals his judgments and sentences for sexual battery and lewd and lascivious molestation on grounds that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the testimony of two undesignated expert witnesses for the State. We agree, and reverse and remand for a new trial.

Everyone agrees in this case that the State violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220 by not designating its expert witnesses in discovery. The parties also agree that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate Richardson hearing. We conclude that the trial court also abused its discretion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Scipio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. Curry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Henry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terry Bess v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Kerry Wilson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Millette v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API