Legal Opinion

In re Rothman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 17, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The evidence before the master was, in my opinion, sufficient to warrant denying discharge to the bankrupt. Specification No. 3 (which for convenience I hav.e considered first), relating to the deliverance by the bankrupt to the objecting creditor of a materially false financial statement, dated Jan•uary 27, 1929, containing a statement of assets and liabilities which did not state various debts to bis friends amounting to $1,000, and in relianee upon the truthfulness of which the objecting creditor extended credit to him, is proven. In the statement the total business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Rubin v. BalabanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  3. In re WalderDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API