Legal Opinion

State v. Burr

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 12, 2001No. 2000-393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Bettina L. Burr, appeals from the Superior Court’s (Mold, J.) order requiring her to pay restitution to the Cocheco Valley Humane Society (CVHS) in connection with her negotiated plea of guilty to twenty counts of animal cruelty. See RSA 644:8 (1996 & Supp. 2000) (amended 2000). We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.

The relevant facts follow. The defendant entered guilty pleas on twenty counts of animal cruelty stemming from her inhumane treatment of twenty Sharpei dogs. The court ordered the defendant to pay restitution to CVHS, the agency that rescued the dogs. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appeal of Estate of Van LunenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  2. Nault v. N & L Development Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. EnoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ShannonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  2. State v. BentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Kenny James Slusser v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2022
  4. State of New Hampshire v. Bruce MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020
  5. State v. Travis C. PaigeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API