Legal Opinion

Zink v. Milner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1913No. 2814PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Canadian County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by E. M. Zink against A. T. Milner and another to obtain custody of a child. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This case was tried in the lower court as an ordinary civil action between F. M. Zink, as plaintiff, and A. T. Milner and Jennie Milner, as defendants; the sole issue being the custody of Merton Spear Zink, the minor son of E. M. Zink. The proceedings wer'e treated by the trial court and the parties as one of habeas corpus, and despite the irregular manner in which the cause was instituted and carried through the lower court, and from thence to this court, we will also treat it as an application and petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The facts of the case, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Kearney v. SteelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Sherrick v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Breckenridge v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Hamann v. MiesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API